Above and below are pictures of some unusual formations I’ve come across in private caves. I enjoy exploring them with owner’s permission. The problem is finding a cave that’s not been messed up by vandals, rock hounds or just inconsiderate cavers. It would be nice if people took out what they brought in and didn’t take out parts of the cave that took many hundreds, if not thousands, of years to form. This is what is left of a drapery formation that someone broke off for its white and amber travertine many years ago. The jagged remains are quite interesting, in this case, probably helped by partial re-growth since then:
There are supposed to be about 10 caves without surface openings for every cave that has an entry. I’ve found a few entrances that look more like animal holes than caves, but some can be gotten into and end up being fairly pristine caves. The trick of identifying them is finding cold air flowing out in the early spring, or hearing running water when your ear is by the hole.
Not all places that have good flow of cold air can be gotten into, though. There’s a place some locals call the “refrigerator” in northern Arkansas where cold air really blasts out, but the air exits through a jumble of huge rock slabs that probably resulted when the outer portion of the cave collapsed. There are only a few inches of space between the slabs. The owner has been digging there to see if he can find a way under, over or around the slabs, but so far, without success.
In living caves, water helps stalactites and stalagmites re-grow from the stubs left by vandals, and flowstone is slowly covering the graffiti left by past visitors. The date on the wall in the photo below looks like 1935. The flowstone that has formed in the past 80 years or so, a beautiful blue-white travertine, has built up to the point of masking most of the printing.
The inscription is below what is known as the “cave ghost”. She’s got an oval mouth, flowing hair, and stands about fifteen feet tall:
This feature looks like the huge face of an old man with blood running down his face from a small hole above his right eye (left as you view the photo). Some people also see an old woman’s face to the left of his, but it’s not quite as clear:
Many of the living caves I’ve been in are a bit uphill of springs, (the “refrigerator” is, too) so I always look in areas above springs for caves. Inside the caves, there often are streams and small underground lakes that feed the springs. One cave had a 20-foot waterfall that splashed down into what looked like a pretty pool until you got close and found the bottom was littered with broken glass, pieces of broken stalactites and other trash left by inconsiderate visitors. A sixty-five foot deep sinkhole (below, looking up) has a spring that shoots water out of a wall like a fire hydrant after heavy rains. In dry weather, it just dribbles. It stays really cold at the bottom – you can see your breath even in the heat of summer, and water from condensation drips everywhere.
A lot of caves are blocked by mudflows back in a ways. Maybe there’s more cave behind the mud, but then again, the whole thing might be plugged up. The picture below is of a cave that’s blocked that way. The mudflow comes in from a crack in the ceiling back 50 feet or so and the mud tapers down toward the entrance. I think the entrance probably has a couple feet of mud over it, too. It’s a cool-looking cave entrance. Too bad it doesn’t lead into to a nice cave. I’ve seen a lot like that.
Unfortunately, none of the undamaged caves I’ve found have been very large or spectacular. But I’m still looking.
Please be a zero-impact caver, and happy caving!
Tally

Since there’s always been plenty of family farm and woodlot land in the family, we haven’t been limited to enjoying the outdoors on public land.
I acknowledge the need for public parks, nature sanctuaries and the like, but sometimes I wonder how much is enough. I’ve been notified that the minimum fee has been upped to $86.35 a year for the use of a National Forest road into my property up north, and I need to pay $100 for forest service personnel to determine if I still need to use the road. When I first bought the property, the forester I contacted asked why I wanted a “Use Permit” for the road going in. He said, “It’s what the law requires, but most people just drive in without a permit.” I guess he was hinting I should do the same. I told him I wanted to obey the law, and he sighed. It meant a lot of paperwork.
The Forest Service sells timber there on a regular basis. It’s OK I guess, because their clear-cut areas grow back into young trees that the deer and other game use for food and cover, but it’s no different than a lumber company when it does that. The land is open for people to walk through, but if you want to drive legally, you’re supposed to have a permit, use a designated ORV trail, or share designated forest roads with logging trucks.
I can see the purpose of protecting redwoods, geysers at Yellowstone, the Grand Canyon and the like. I can see protecting virgin forests, as well as examples of bogs and fens full of the remnants of wildlife once common to early settlers, but rare now. The question is, how commonplace do these things need to become? When are enough areas set aside that uses of private land need not be restricted? Many people are finding the only recourse is to sell conservation easements (or donate them for the tax benefits) to be able to afford keeping the land in their families.
Without a permit, I don’t think that a person in this state would be allowed to remove a tree fallen across a beaver channel through a swamp on their own land if they want to get their canoe through the channel to the lake beyond. Dragging the canoe around the log is the only legal option. The law in this state also prohibits driving an ORV through a swamp, even on your own land. And a wetland here extends 500 feet from a pond or lake by legal definition. Agricultural activities are partially exempt. A bog can be plowed up and planted in cranberries if you want - it just can’t be dammed or drained without a permit. Beavers, of course, don't need permits. Here's one heading for a spatterdock blossom for breakfast.
It’s interesting how things vary from state to state. The common wild grape, native to this country, is endangered in Maine, but prohibited in Ohio as an invasive species. It’s easy for me to consider an imported species as being invasive – like foreign troops “invading” the countryside. It’s more difficult when they are part of our nation’s heritage. If passenger pigeons had survived rather than being shot to extinction, still clouding the skies today as they did in the 19th century, would they also be called invasive today? It would be a pest, certainly, like the sandhill crane, protected in eastern states, but hunted in many western states because its migration flocks cause damage to crops. I guess if you’re a protectionist in this case, you can choose to live in the east, and if you want to put one of the beautiful big birds in your freezer, go west. We have that much choice in the matter, at least.
